Rare earths
Magnet materials
Watch and Edit are coming soon.
China refined 83% (IEA) of the world's rare earths in 2025; China mined 69% (USGS).
83%
of the world's rare earths was refined in China in 2025, according to IEA · about 4 in 5
ANNUAL 2025
Leading mining country
69%
China, 2025 (estimated), USGS
Leading refining country
83%
China, 2025, IEA
Sites on record
11
Mines and plants in the open sources. Coverage is partial. Also on record: 75 deposits and projects, which are not counted.
Recycling's share of EU demand
1% / 10% / 0%
Neodymium / Praseodymium / Dysprosium, 2022, EU only
Overview
Rare-earth elements are mined together, then separated into individual oxides. Neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium go into permanent magnets for motors and wind turbines.
Map
- Share of world mine output
- Mine or brine operation
- Processing site
- Deposit or project (not a mine or a plant yet)
Sites are those in the open sources. A site missing here is missing from the sources, not from the world.
2025
Key facts
- Group
- Magnet materials
- Stages in the atlas
- Reserves · Mine · Process · Refine · Component · Recycle
- World mine production, 2025
- 390 000 metric tons (estimated)
- World refinery production, 2025
- 89 kt REE
- Open price series
- None
Leading countries
Mine · USGS, 2025 (estimated)
- Chinaabout 2 in 369%
- United Statesabout 1 in 1013%
- Australiaabout 1 in 207.4%
- Burmaabout 1 in 205.6%
- Thailand1.2%
Refine · IEA, 2025
- Chinaabout 4 in 583%
- United Statesabout 1 in 205.6%
- Malaysiaabout 1 in 205.6%
- France1.1%
- Viet Nam1.1%
The five largest shares of each stage's latest table. One source per stage; the Supply chain tab has every source and every row.
What the source does not cover
- No open price series for rare earths: the World Bank Pink Sheet does not cover it, and the price services that do are licensed, so no price is shown.
Supply chain
Every stage with its table by country, the flow between stages, the largest recorded trade flows and the sites on record.
Reserves
Revised by the source. USGS revised this table in version 1.3 of the report (27 May 2026): Brazil's reserves changed from 21,000,000 to 11,000,000 t and the world total from >85,000,000 to >75,000,000 t. The data release still carries the earlier figures, which are the ones shown here. Revision history
Concentration
ANNUAL 2025China holds about half (52 %) of the world's rare earths reserves recorded here.
Reserves · 2025
(Data in metric tons, rare-earth-oxide (REO) equivalent, unless otherwise specified)
- Top 3 countries
- 83.6 %
- China, Brazil, Australia
Who holds what
- China44 000 000 t51.6 %
- Brazil21 000 000 t24.6 %
- Australia6 300 000 t7.4 %
- Russia3 800 000 t4.5 %
- Vietnam3 500 000 t4.1 %
- United States1 900 000 t2.2 %
- Greenland1 500 000 t1.8 %
- Tanzania890 000 t1.0 %
- South Africa860 000 t1.0 %
- Canada830 000 t1.0 %
- Malaysia710 000 t0.8 %
- BurmaNot available
- IndiaNot available
- MadagascarNot available
- NigeriaNot available
- ThailandNot available
- Other countriesNot available
- World total>85,000,000
Mine
Concentration
ANNUAL 2025China mines about 2 in 3 (69 %) of the world's rare earths recorded here.
Mine production · 2025 (estimated)
(Data in metric tons, rare-earth-oxide (REO) equivalent, unless otherwise specified)
- Top 3 countries
- 89.7 %
- China, United States, Australia
Who holds what
- China270 000 t69.2 %
- United States51 000 t13.1 %
- Australia29 000 t7.4 %
- Burma22 000 t5.6 %
- Thailand4 800 t1.2 %
- India2 900 t0.7 %
- Madagascar2 700 t0.7 %
- Russia2 600 t0.7 %
- Brazil2 000 t0.5 %
- Nigeria1 500 t0.4 %
- Other countries550 t0.1 %
- Vietnam150 t0.0 %
- Malaysia110 t0.0 %
- CanadaNil (—) in source
- GreenlandNil (—) in source
- South AfricaNil (—) in source
- TanzaniaNil (—) in source
- World total390 000 t
Process
No data yet: Rare earths, process stage
We have no sourced record for this. We never fill gaps with estimates.
Help add it
Refine
Concentration
ANNUAL 2025China refines about 4 in 5 (83 %) of the world's rare earths recorded here.
Refining (IEA) · 2025
kt = kilotonnes. Lao PDR = Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Rare earth elements refer only to four magnet rare earths : neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium.
- Top 3 countries
- 94.4 %
- China, United States, Malaysia
Who holds what
- China75 kt REE83.3 %
- United States5 kt REE5.6 %
- Malaysia5 kt REE5.6 %
- Other countries3 kt REE3.3 %
- France1 kt REE1.1 %
- Viet Nam1 kt REE1.1 %
- World total89 kt REE
Component
No data yet: Rare earths, component stage
We have no sourced record for this. We never fill gaps with estimates.
Help add it
Recycle
No data yet: Rare earths, recycle stage
We have no sourced record for this. We never fill gaps with estimates.
Help add it
Flow through the stages
Bars are each country's share of one stage, taken from one source. Bands are trade flows that customs data record between two countries. The two are measured differently, so a band's width says nothing about a bar's height. Where the data records nothing, the diagram says so.
The diagram is wider than this screen. Swipe it sideways to see every stage.
- Bar: a country's share of the stage's output. Height is the share. Sources:Mine 2025Refine 2025
- Band: recorded trade, by value, 2024. In US dollars, not tonnes. Width compares flows of the same product only. A band runs from the exporter to the importer's place in the next stage; the data does not say what the importer did with the product. The data holds only the largest flows of the material: 40 of 2 389 flows, covering 83.7 % of traded value.
- Dashed band: the customs code mixes grades or forms, so the stage of the product is uncertain. The table marks these with ≈.
- Dashed box: a country that appears in a recorded trade flow but has no row in this stage's table. It has no share.
- Not recorded: material processed in the country that mined it. Trade data only sees border crossings. A dotted line joins a country that appears in two neighbouring tables.
- Return arrow: recycling's share of EU demand (end-of-life recycling input rate). EU only, so it cannot be compared with the world shares above. Width: 1 px at 0 % to 10 px at 100 %.
Table of what is drawn (26 country marks, 40 trade flows)
| Stage | Country | Share | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mine 2025 | China | 58.8 % | 47 kt REE | |
| Mine 2025 | Myanmar | 16.3 % | 13 kt REE | |
| Mine 2025 | United States | 8.8 % | 7 kt REE | |
| Mine 2025 | Australia | 5.0 % | 4 kt REE | |
| Mine 2025 | Lao PDR | 5.0 % | 4 kt REE | |
| Mine 2025 | Other / not attributed | 6.3 % | 5 kt REEthe source's own "other" row | |
| Refine 2025 | China | 83.3 % | 75 kt REE | |
| Refine 2025 | United States | 5.6 % | 5 kt REE | |
| Refine 2025 | Malaysia | 5.6 % | 5 kt REE | |
| Refine 2025 | France | 1.1 % | 1 kt REE | |
| Refine 2025 | Viet Nam | 1.1 % | 1 kt REE | |
| Refine 2025 | Other / not attributed | 3.3 % | 3 kt REEthe source's own "other" row |
| Product of stage | From → to | Million USD | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refine ≈ | Myanmar → China | 817.8 | |
| Refine ≈ | Lao People's Dem. Rep. → China | 259.6 | |
| Refine ≈ | Malaysia → China | 194.2 | |
| Refine ≈ | Viet Nam → Japan | 162.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | Australia → Malaysia | 128.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Japan | 125.4 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → USA | 111.3 | |
| Refine ≈ | Malaysia → Viet Nam | 72.9 | |
| Refine ≈ | Malaysia → Japan | 64.3 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Japan | 61.6 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → Viet Nam | 45.3 | |
| Refine ≈ | Malaysia → Thailand | 43.8 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Rep. of Korea | 37.7 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → Philippines | 34.6 | |
| Refine | France → Japan | 32.9 | |
| Refine ≈ | USA → Viet Nam | 29.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Viet Nam | 26.7 | |
| Refine ≈ | Viet Nam → China | 25.9 | |
| Refine | Japan → Other Asia, nes | 25 | |
| Refine ≈ | Thailand → Japan | 21.3 | |
| Refine ≈ | Viet Nam → China | 19.9 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Viet Nam | 17.8 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → China | 17.6 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Fed. Rep. of Germany (...1990) | 17.4 | |
| Refine ≈ | USA → China | 17.2 | |
| Refine | Japan → Singapore | 15.2 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → Rep. of Korea | 14.2 | |
| Refine | Japan → USA | 14.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | India → Viet Nam | 13.9 | |
| Refine ≈ | Thailand → Viet Nam | 13.2 | |
| Refine ≈ | Malaysia → Thailand | 12.2 | |
| Refine ≈ | Viet Nam → Singapore | 11.9 | |
| Refine ≈ | France → USA | 10.6 | |
| Refine ≈ | France → Fed. Rep. of Germany (...1990) | 10.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → Viet Nam | 10.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | Fed. Rep. of Germany (...1990) → Russian Federation | 10 | |
| Refine | Russian Federation → Estonia | 9.4 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Türkiye | 9.1 | |
| Refine ≈ | Japan → France | 9 | |
| Refine ≈ | China → Other Asia, nes | 8.9 |
Countries drawn as dashed boxes (in trade flows only)
- Refine: Myanmar; Lao People's Dem. Rep.; Japan; Australia; Thailand; India; 2 more countries (Fed. Rep. of Germany (...1990), Russian Federation)
- Component: China; Japan; Viet Nam; USA; Malaysia; Thailand; 9 more countries (Rep. of Korea, Philippines, Other Asia, nes, Fed. Rep. of Germany (...1990), Singapore, Russian Federation, Estonia, Türkiye, France)
Recycling loop
- Neodymium: 1.0 % (2022, European Union)
- Praseodymium: 10.0 % (2022, European Union)
- Dysprosium: 0.0 % (2022, European Union)
Largest trade flows · 2024
Reconciled customs data (CEPII BACI), by value. Trade data lags: this is the latest complete year. 40 of 2 389 flows shown, covering 83.7 % of traded value.
| From → to | Product of stage | Million USD | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myanmar → China | Refine ≈ | 817.8 | |
| Lao People's Dem. Rep. → China | Refine ≈ | 259.6 | |
| Malaysia → China | Refine ≈ | 194.2 | |
| Viet Nam → Japan | Refine ≈ | 162.1 | |
| Australia → Malaysia | Refine ≈ | 128.1 | |
| China → Japan | Refine ≈ | 125.4 | |
| China → USA | Refine ≈ | 111.3 | |
| Malaysia → Viet Nam | Refine ≈ | 72.9 | |
| Malaysia → Japan | Refine ≈ | 64.3 | |
| China → Japan | Refine ≈ | 61.6 |
≈ marks a customs code that mixes grades or forms of the material, so stages cannot be told apart. Expert mode shows the codes.
Sites on record · 11 and 75 deposits and projects
86 of 86 shown
- AileronDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- AmbergateDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- AshramProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- AvonbankProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Bayan Obo iron-rare-earth-niobium depositMine · China
- Bayan Obo iron-rare-earth-niobium depositMine · China
- BidaminnaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Blue's FolleyDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- BrigantineDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- BrockmanDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Brookes BoreDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Browns RangeProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- BungalallyDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- BurracoppinDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- CalypsoDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- CavalierDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Charley CreekDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Circle ValleyDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- CoburnMine · Australia
- CowalinyaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Crater LakeProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- Cummins RangeDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Deep LeadsDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- DonaldProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Doubloon NorthDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- DubboProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Elaine DorothyDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- EneabbaProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Eneabba-REERefinery · Australia
- FingerboardsDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- GoschenProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Goschen CentralDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Goschen SouthDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Gray BridgeDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Gwindinup NorthDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Hassell BeachDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- HorizonProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- Jacks TankDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- John GaltDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- JupiterDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- KennedyDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Kipawa-ZeusProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- KoppamurraDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- KorellaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- KwyjiboProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- LyonsDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- MalmbergetMine · Sweden
- MangaroonDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Mary KathleenDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- MiaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- MiloDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Minhub-REE-HMSRefinery · Australia
- Mitre HillDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- MonsDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Mount WeldMine · Australia
- NaracoopaMine · Australia
- NarraburraDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Nechalacho - Basal ZoneProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- Nechalacho - T-Zone & Tardiff ZoneProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- NewmontDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Nolans BoreProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- Nolans-REERefinery · Australia
- Norra KärrDeposit (no mine) · Sweden
- North StanmoreDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- O'ConnorDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- OlserumDeposit (no mine) · Sweden
- Olympic DamMine · Australia
- Per Geijer-malmenDeposit (no mine) · Sweden
- Port Hope Simpson (Deep Fox and Foxtrot)Project (not producing yet) · Canada
- RapidSX Demonstration PlantProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- Rare Earth Separation PlantProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- RedlingsDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- REE Recycling Facility (Saint-Hubert)Project (not producing yet) · Canada
- Sandy MitchellDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- Splinter RockDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- SRC Rare Earth Processing FacilitySmelter · Canada
- Strange LakeProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- SybellaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- TowerDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- WedderburnDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- WicheedaProject (not producing yet) · Canada
- Wim 100Deposit (no mine) · Australia
- Wim 150Deposit (no mine) · Australia
- WudinnaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
- YangibanaProject (not producing yet) · Australia
- YttriaDeposit (no mine) · Australia
One entry per site. Where two sources describe the same site, the atlas lists the record of the source it ranks higher.
United States view: Rare earths
These figures describe the United States only. They are not global figures.
- Net import reliance · 2025
- 67 %
- Import sources · 2021-24
- China71 %
- Malaysia13 %
- Japan5 %
- Estonia5 %
- Other6 %
- Main uses
- Dysprosium: Data storage devices, lasers, and permanent magnets.
- Neodymium: Catalysts, lasers, and permanent magnets.
- Praseodymium: Aerospace alloys, batteries, ceramics, colorants, and permanent magnets.
- Terbium: Fiber optics, lasers, permanent magnets, and solid state devices.
Money
The open price series where one exists, and one estimate with its formula. No licensed market data is shown.
Price
There is no open price series for rare earths, so the atlas shows no price and no estimated value.
- No open price series for rare earths: the World Bank Pink Sheet does not cover it, and the price services that do are licensed, so no price is shown.
An estimated production value is computed only where an open price exists (copper and nickel). Why prices are missing
Investment pipeline
announced figuresPlanned and under-construction rare earths projects with a publicly announced capital cost, public financial backing, or both. Each line is one statement by the named publisher on the given date; the atlas adds nothing to it.
CAREMAGUnder constructionProcessing
Caremag SAS · Lacq, in the south of France · France · Rare earths
“ont posé la première pierre de l’usine Caremag” · status as printed on 2025-03-31
- Announced capital cost
EUR 216 M2025-03-17
financing secured to build the rare earth recycling and refining industrial facility in Lacq (printed as financing, not as a cost estimate) · Carester
The publisher's words: “has secured €216 million to build its cutting-edge rare earth recycling and refining industrial facility in Lacq”
- Public backing
no amount statedStrategic project status · “recognised as Strategic Project (Commission Decision C(2025) 1904, annex item 7)” · 2025-03-25
European Commission
The publisher's words: “CAREMAG is an ongoing processing project in France. The project promoted by Caremag SAS”
EUR 106 MOther support · “subsidies and repayable advances granted under the France Relance and France 2030 project calls, as well as a Green Industry tax credit” · 2025-03-17
French government
The publisher's words: “this project is backed by €110 million from Japanese investors and €106 million from the French government”
Elk Creek ProjectPlannedMine and processing
NioCorp Developments Ltd. · southeast Nebraska · United States · Rare earths
“subject to satisfactory completion of EXIM’s current due diligence review of NioCorp’s application for debt financing” · status as printed on 2026-10-15
- Announced capital cost
USD 1.85 bn2026-08-10
Upfront Capital Estimate (2026 Feasibility Study); table row: Total Upfront CAPEX ($M) $1,849 · NioCorp Developments Ltd.
The publisher's words: “Upfront Capital Estimate of $1.85 Billion Reflects a Substantially Redesigned Processing Plant and Mining Operation”
- Public backing
no amount statedOther support · “letter of support” · 2026-10-15
Export-Import Bank of the United States
The publisher's words: “The Export-Import Bank of the United States’ letter of support marks an important step towards making the Elk Creek Critical Minerals Project a reality”
no amount statedOther support · “target ... of providing debt financing equivalent to approximately 65% of the Project’s upfront CAPEX requirements” · 2026-10-15
Export-Import Bank of the United States
The publisher's words: “EXIM retains our target outlined in the Preliminary Project Letter of providing debt financing equivalent to approximately 65% of the Project’s upfront CAPEX requirements”
A short, hand-read list, not a census: 19 projects in all. Announced amounts are not spending, a letter of interest or a conditional commitment is not a loan, and amounts stay in the currency of the announcement.
Public support instruments
Stockpiles, price floors, offtake and purchasing programmes and public funds whose source names rare earths, and general critical-minerals instruments (marked). Each is one statement by its publisher.
2024-05-23in force from · European UnionJoint purchasingin force
The Critical Raw Materials Act obliges the Commission to run a demand-aggregation and joint-purchasing system for strategic raw materials and to set a benchmark for strategic stocks.
Covers: “strategic raw materials” · Materials: Cobalt, Copper, Gallium, Germanium, Lithium, Graphite, Nickel, Rare earths, Tungsten
The publisher's words: “The Commission shall set up and operate a system to aggregate the demand of interested undertakings consuming strategic raw materials established in the Union”
2 further statements from the source
joint negotiation of purchases allowed (Article 25(5))
The publisher's words: “may, on a transparent basis, jointly negotiate the purchase, including the prices or other terms and conditions of the purchasing agreement”
coordination of strategic stocks (Article 23)
The publisher's words: “shall adopt a benchmark indicating a safe level of Union strategic stocks of strategic raw materials”
2024-08-29published · United StatesStockpileannounced
Federal Register notice seeking comments on the proposed fiscal year 2026 plan for National Defense Stockpile acquisitions, including antimony, tungsten and neodymium-praseodymium oxide.
Covers: “Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Annual Materials Plan (potential acquisitions, conversions and disposals of the National Defense Stockpile)” · Materials: Antimony, Tungsten, Rare earths
The publisher's words: “is seeking public comments on the potential market impact of proposed changes to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Materials Plan (AMP)”
4 further statements from the source
potential acquisition: antimony, 700 metric tons
The publisher's words: “Antimony....................................... MT............................... 700”
potential acquisition: tungsten, 587,000 lbs W
The publisher's words: “Tungsten....................................... Lbs W............................ 587,000”
potential acquisition: NdPr oxide, 300 metric tons
The publisher's words: “Neodymium-Praseodymium Oxide................... MT............................... 300”
nature of the stockpile
The publisher's words: “The NDS is a strategic stockpile, not an economic stockpile. It is not intended to influence prices in the market”
2025-06-17announced · G7Other supportannounced
G7 leaders launched a Critical Minerals Action Plan with a roadmap for standards-based markets and a call for more public and private capital for critical minerals projects.
Covers: “critical minerals”
critical minerals in general; the source does not name rare earths
The publisher's words: “We will develop a roadmap to promote standards-based markets for critical minerals”
3 further statements from the source
launch of the plan
The publisher's words: “We are launching a G7 Critical Minerals Action Plan”
roadmap content
The publisher's words: “The roadmap will establish a set of criteria that constitute a minimum threshold for standards-based markets”
capital mobilisation
The publisher's words: “We encourage our export credit agencies and development finance institutions (DFIs) to identify more opportunities for collaboration”
2025-07announced · United StatesPrice floorannounced
In a public-private partnership with MP Materials, the Department of Defense committed to a price floor for neodymium-praseodymium, with direct payments to the company when prices fall below it.
Covers: “per kilogram of Nd-Pr” · Materials: Rare earths
The publisher's words: “commit to an REE price floor, offering direct payments to MP Materials if prices fall below $110 per kilogram of Nd-Pr”
2025-10-20signed · United States and AustraliaFundannounced
Bilateral, non-binding framework in which both governments commit financing for critical minerals and rare earths projects and name price floors as a possible pricing tool.
USD 1 bn · “at least $1 billion in financing to projects located in each of the United States and Australia”
Covers: “critical minerals and rare earths” · Materials: Rare earths
The publisher's words: “the Participants are taking measures to provide at least $1 billion in financing to projects located in each of the United States and Australia”
2 further statements from the source
price floors named
The publisher's words: “within a pricing framework including price floors or similar measures”
non-binding character
The publisher's words: “does not constitute or create any legally binding or enforceable obligations, express or implied”
2025-10-28signed · United States and JapanOther supportannounced
Bilateral, non-binding framework on financial support, pricing measures and a possible complementary stockpiling arrangement for critical minerals and rare earths.
Covers: “critical minerals and rare earths” · Materials: Rare earths
The publisher's words: “The Participants intend to work together to consider a mutually complementary stockpiling arrangement, utilizing existing national systems”
2 further statements from the source
pricing measures
The publisher's words: “pricing measures to support alternative projects and such high-standard markets”
financial support within six months
The publisher's words: “the Participants intend to take measures to provide financial support to selected projects”
2025-11-04published · CanadaFundannounced
Budget 2025 proposes a Critical Minerals Sovereign Fund at Natural Resources Canada for equity investments, loan guarantees and offtake agreements, and a First and Last Mile Fund.
CAD 2 bn · “$2 billion over five years, on a cash basis, starting in 2026-27”
Covers: “critical minerals projects and companies”
critical minerals in general; the source does not name rare earths
The publisher's words: “provide $2 billion over five years, on a cash basis, starting in 2026-27, to Natural Resources Canada to create the Critical Minerals Sovereign Fund”
3 further statements from the source
tools of the fund
The publisher's words: “including equity investments, loan guarantees, and offtake agreements”
First and Last Mile Fund
The publisher's words: “provide $371.8 million over four years, starting in 2026-27, to Natural Resources Canada to create the First and Last Mile Fund”
absorbs the Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund
The publisher's words: “would absorb the Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund and leverage its existing funding envelope to provide up to $1.5 billion in support through 2029-30”
2025-11-22published · United KingdomFundannounced
The UK critical minerals strategy Vision 2035 announces public funding for critical mineral projects and says stockpiling through procurement will be considered for the defence sector.
GBP 50 M · “up to £50 million”
Covers: “critical mineral projects in the UK”
critical minerals in general; the source does not name rare earths
The publisher's words: “funding of up to £50 million will be made available by DBT to support critical mineral projects”
2 further statements from the source
stockpiling under consideration
The publisher's words: “Measures could include stockpiling, including through procurement mechanisms”
later programme page (published 22 June 2026): grant share
The publisher's words: “with £45 million of this available as grant funding”
2025-12-03announced · European UnionFundannounced
The Commission adopted the RESourceEU Action Plan: project financing, a European Critical Raw Materials Centre, joint purchasing through the Raw Materials Platform and a stockpiling pilot.
EUR 3 bn · “up to €3 billion over the next 12 months”
Covers: “critical raw materials, such as rare earth elements, cobalt or lithium” · Materials: Rare earths, Cobalt, Lithium
The publisher's words: “The EU will mobilise up to €3 billion over the next 12 months to support concrete projects”
5 further statements from the source
adoption
The publisher's words: “The European Commission has adopted today the RESourceEU Action Plan”
European Critical Raw Materials Centre planned
The publisher's words: “In early 2026, the Commission will set up a European Critical Raw Materials Centre”
joint purchasing and offtake via the Raw Materials Platform
The publisher's words: “the Raw Materials Platform will facilitate the efforts of the companies to aggregate demand, jointly purchase strategic raw materials and secure offtake agreements”
stockpiling pilot
The publisher's words: “with a pilot scheme set to become operational in early 2026”
materials named
The publisher's words: “secure the EU's supply of critical raw materials, such as rare earth elements, cobalt or lithium”
2026-01-12announced · AustraliaStockpileannounced
The Australian Government announced the design of its Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve, which secures rights to minerals produced in Australia and on-sells them, with some selective stockpiling.
AUD 1.2 bn · “$1.2 billion”
Covers: “antimony, gallium and rare earth elements” · Materials: Antimony, Gallium, Rare earths
The publisher's words: “The first minerals to be the focus of the Strategic Reserve will be antimony, gallium and rare earth elements”
4 further statements from the source
size of the reserve
The publisher's words: “new details of its $1.2 billion Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve”
how it operates
The publisher's words: “The Reserve will operate by securing rights to minerals produced in Australia and on-selling those rights to meet demand”
transactions drawn from the Critical Minerals Facility
The publisher's words: “The Reserve includes $1 billion for transactions to be drawn from the expanded $5 billion Critical Minerals Facility”
stockpiling share
The publisher's words: “A further $185 million has been allocated for selective stockpiling of minerals”
2026-01-14signed · United StatesPrice floorannounced
Presidential proclamation under section 232 directing negotiations on imports of processed critical minerals, in which price floors for trade in critical minerals are to be considered.
Covers: “processed critical minerals and their derivative products (PCMDPs)”
critical minerals in general; the source does not name rare earths
The publisher's words: “the Secretary and the Trade Representative should consider price floors for trade in critical minerals and other trade-restricting measures”
2026-02-02announced · United StatesStockpileannounced
The Export-Import Bank approved a direct loan for Project Vault, a public-private partnership that is to establish a U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve storing raw materials for manufacturers.
USD 10 bn · “a Direct Loan of up to $10 billion”
Covers: “essential raw materials”
critical minerals in general; the source does not name rare earths
The publisher's words: “the EXIM Board of Directors approved a Direct Loan of up to $10 billion to Project Vault”
4 further statements from the source
what it establishes
The publisher's words: “a supply chain security initiative establishing the U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve”
storage
The publisher's words: “that will store essential raw materials in facilities across the United States”
borrower structure
The publisher's words: “providing long-term financing to a partnership between original equipment manufacturers and private sector capital providers”
later EXIM release of May 4, 2026 restating the loan
The publisher's words: “The transaction includes a direct loan of up to $10 billion”
2026-05-21announced · AustraliaOfftakeannounced
Through the Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve the Australian Government gave a non-binding commitment to secure rare earths from the Nolans project of Arafura Rare Earths.
Covers: “500 tonnes of rare earths” · Materials: Rare earths
The publisher's words: “The Government has provided a non-binding commitment to secure 500 tonnes of rare earths from the project, through the Reserve”
2 further statements from the source
funding committed to the reserve
The publisher's words: “The Government has committed $1.2 billion to establish”
product
The publisher's words: “The Nolans project will produce neodymium-praseodymium oxide, or NdPr”
There is no open price series for rare earths, so these instruments are listed without a chart.
These figures are informational, not financial advice.
Sustainability
Four indicators, the same on every profile. Each is a figure with its unit, year and source, or a plain statement that there is none.
Carbon
Grid-carbon proxy: the grid intensity of the refining countries, weighted by their share of refining.
518gCO2e/kWh
Higher than 50% of the other 6 materials with a computed proxy.
- Covers the countries behind 97% of refinery output (Refining (IEA), 2025).
- Average grid emissions intensity of the countries that refine the material, weighted by each country's share of refinery output in the source table. Countries without a grid figure are left out and the covered share is stated. A proxy for the electricity behind refining, not a product footprint: plants may run on their own power.
Water
Share of the material's mine sites on record that lie in high or extremely high baseline water stress.
0%of mine sites on record
None of the other 7 materials with rated mine sites has a lower figure.
- 0 of 7 sites with a class (7 mine and brine sites on record).
- Counted by site, not by tonnage: it is not a share of production.
- "Arid and Low Water Use" is a class of its own in the source and is not counted as high.
Land
Land visibly used by mining.
Not available per material: the area is mapped per country for all commodities together.
- Mapped from satellite images for all mining in a country. It cannot be attributed to one material or one site.
Circularity
Recycling's share of EU demand (end-of-life recycling input rate).
1% / 10% / 0%Neodymium / Praseodymium / Dysprosium
Several elements, each with its own rate; no single percentile is given.
- Published for the EU as a whole. It cannot be compared with world shares.
- End-of-life recycling input rate: the share of EU demand met by recycling old scrap. EU only. Values differ between assessment years partly because the method changed.
- 4 EU targets apply to this material; they are listed below.
There is no overall score: the four figures measure different things and are not added up. How to read these figures
The figures behind the indicators
Grid-carbon proxy for refining
estimated · proxy518gCO2e per kWh
Covers the countries behind 96.7% of refinery output (Refining (IEA), 2025)
| Country | Share of refining | Grid intensity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 83.3% | 5282025 | |
| United States | 5.6% | 3842025 | |
| Malaysia | 5.6% | 6062025 | |
| France | 1.1% | 412025 | |
| Viet Nam | 1.1% | 4592025 |
Average grid emissions intensity of the countries that refine the material, weighted by each country's share of refinery output in the source table. Countries without a grid figure are left out and the covered share is stated. A proxy for the electricity behind refining, not a product footprint: plants may run on their own power.
Water stress where the mines are
estimated · by site0%of mine sites on record lie in high or extremely high water stress (0 of 7)
- Low (<10%)2 sites
- Medium - High (20-40%)1 site
- Arid and Low Water Use4 sites
Of the mines and brine operations the atlas has on record for the material, the share that lies in a sub-basin with high or extremely high baseline water stress (WRI Aqueduct 4.0). Counted by site, not by tonnage: the atlas has no output figure for most sites, so this is not a share of production. "Arid and Low Water Use" is the source's own class for dry sub-basins with little demand; it is shown apart (hatched) because it is not a stress level.
Circularity
Recycling's share of EU demand (end-of-life recycling input rate)
| Material | 2013 | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neodymium | 0% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | |
| Praseodymium | 0% | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| Dysprosium | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
End-of-life recycling input rate: the share of EU demand met by recycling old scrap. EU only. Values differ between assessment years partly because the method changed. The latest published figure is for 2022.
EU targets that apply
10% EU extraction benchmark from 31 December 2030
EU extraction capacity, for strategic raw materials overall
Legal text: “by 2030 … at least 10 % of the Union’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials” Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 (Critical Raw Materials Act), Article 5(1)(a)(i) ↗
40% EU processing benchmark from 31 December 2030
EU processing capacity, for strategic raw materials overall
Legal text: “by 2030 … at least 40 % of the Union’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials” Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 (Critical Raw Materials Act), Article 5(1)(a)(ii) ↗
25% EU recycling benchmark from 31 December 2030
EU recycling capacity, for strategic raw materials overall
Legal text: “by 2030 … at least 25 % of the Union’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials” Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 (Critical Raw Materials Act), Article 5(1)(a)(iii) ↗
65% Single-country limit from 31 December 2030
Largest share of EU consumption that may come from one non-EU country, per strategic raw material and processing stage
Legal text: “by 2030 … no third country accounts for more than 65 % of the Union’s annual consumption of such a strategic raw material” Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 (Critical Raw Materials Act), Article 5(1)(b) ↗
Read in the original Official Journal version; later amendments are not reflected.
Risks & policy
Export controls in force
Compiled by USGS, effective January 2026. Not a live feed.
- ▲ BanMalaysia2024
Export ban: Raw rare earths (2024).
Source ↗ - ▲ BanNamibia2023
Export ban: Ores and concentrates of cobalt, graphite, lithium, manganese, and rare earths (2023).
Source ↗ - ▲ BanVietnam2012
Export ban: Raw materials of iron, lead-zinc, chromite, manganese, apatite, and rare earths and deeply processed titanium (2012).
Source ↗ - ▲ LicenceChina2025
Export licensing requirement for materials and technologies: Antimony (2024), bismuth (2025), synthesized diamond (2025), gallium (2023), germanium (2023), graphite (2023), indium (2025), magnesium materials (2024), molybdenum (2025), rare earths (2025), silver (2026), tellurium (2025), tungsten (2025), and items related to lithium batteries and artificial graphite anode materials (2025).
Source ↗
Chokepoints at sea
The atlas has no record of which minerals pass through which sea passage, so no chokepoint figure is attached to this profile. Current ship counts for the main passages are on the Live page. Open the Live page
What if?
Three calculators run on the figures of this profile. Each shows its formula and what it leaves out; none is a forecast.
What the atlas does not know about rare earths
How much of the chain is on record, which producer countries have no site in the atlas, how mining and refining compare, and whether a price is open.
Data coverage
Mines on record: 76.7% (2/12)
Plants on record: 0% (0/5)
Owner or operator known: 7.4% (1/12)
Assurance known: no public assurance list is ingested yet
Mines:77% of world output lies in countries with a record (2 of 12 countries)(Mine production, 2025)
Producer countries without a record: United States 13%, Burma 5.6%, Thailand 1.2%, India 0.7%, Madagascar 0.7%, Russia 0.7%, Brazil 0.5%, Nigeria 0.4%, Vietnam 0%, Malaysia 0%
Processing plants:0% of world output lies in countries with a record (0 of 5 countries)(Refining (IEA), 2025)
Producer countries without a record: China 83%, United States 5.6%, Malaysia 5.6%, France 1.1%, Viet Nam 1.1%
Owners and operators:7.4% of world output lies in countries with a record (1 of 12 countries)(Mine production, 2025)
Producer countries without a record: China 69%, United States 13%, Burma 5.6%, Thailand 1.2%, India 0.7%, Madagascar 0.7%, Russia 0.7%, Brazil 0.5%, Nigeria 0.4%, Vietnam 0%, Malaysia 0%
- Assurance: No public assurance list is ingested yet
A country in these lists marks missing data, not missing industry.
Mining and refining: who leads
IEA GCMO 2026, 2025
- Mining:China 59% (about 3 in 5), 2025
- Refining:China 83% (about 4 in 5), 2025
Price transparency
No open price series for rare earths: the services that publish one are licensed, so no price is shown.
Sources
Every source this profile uses, with its licence, the years its figures describe and how sure the figures are. Each chip on the profile opens the single record.
- Geoscience Australia critical minerals 2025 ↗52 records used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2025
- Confidence
- Reported
- CEPII BACI 202601 ↗40 records used
- Licence
- Etalab Open Licence 2.0
- As of
- 2024
- Confidence
- Estimated
- Eurostat cei_srm010 (EOL-RIR) ↗13 records used
- Licence
- Eurostat reuse policy (reuse authorised with acknowledgement of the source)
- As of
- 2013–2022
- Confidence
- Reported
- NRCan critical minerals 2026 ↗13 records used
- Licence
- OGL-Canada-2.0
- As of
- 2026
- Confidence
- Reported
- Geoscience Australia operating mines 2025 ↗11 records used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2025
- Confidence
- Reported
- USGS MCS 2026 ↗9 records used
- Licence
- CC0-1.0
- As of
- 2024–2026
- Confidence
- Reported · Estimated
- IEA GCMO 2026 ↗6 records used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2021–2025
- Confidence
- Reported
- Ember Yearly Electricity Data ↗5 records used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2025
- Confidence
- Reported
- SGU mineral resources 2026 ↗4 records used
- Licence
- CC0-1.0
- As of
- 2019–2026
- Confidence
- Reported
- Geoscience Australia plants 2026 ↗3 records used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2026
- Confidence
- Reported
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass) ↗2 records used
- Licence
- ODbL-1.0
- As of
- 2026
- Confidence
- Estimated
- NRCan Map 900A (2025) ↗1 record used
- Licence
- OGL-Canada-2.0
- As of
- 2025
- Confidence
- Reported
- WRI Aqueduct 4.0 ↗1 record used
- Licence
- CC-BY-4.0
- As of
- 2023
- Confidence
- Estimated
Source registry for this material
- Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 Data Release ↗, U.S. Geological Survey, National Minerals Information Center. Licence: CC0-1.0. annual (February).
- BACI bilateral trade flows at HS6 (version 202601) ↗, CEPII. Licence: Etalab Open Licence 2.0. annual.
- Contribution of recycled materials to raw materials demand, end-of-life recycling input rates (cei_srm010) ↗, Eurostat. Licence: Eurostat reuse policy (reuse authorised with acknowledgement of the source). every three years, with the EU critical raw materials assessment.
- Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (annex supply tables) ↗, International Energy Agency. Licence: CC-BY-4.0. annual.
History & talk
Revision history and discussion are coming soon.
Every change to a figure will be listed here with its source, its credit and its review, and each profile will have a place to discuss it. Until then the data changes only when a source is updated, and every figure links to that source.